Masculinities in the Television Series, Friends Essay

Masculinities in the Television Series, Friends - set about ExampleI ingest looked into how Joey and Chandler mutually engage with each other, in what context this takes place, and what structures it. How does this relate to the real world K ben baby-walker discusses how men and women relate their behavior and conceptualize personal relations within ethnic ideologies of relations ( stroller 126). Walkers line of work is that virtually writers on friendships fail to grasp that there are differences between the (gendered) cultural ideologies and social reality. heathen ideologies signify models and ideals that high society and culture enforce upon the sexes. The depiction of Joey and Chandler may serve to counter work predominate ideologies of buddy relations representing homosociality. The concept of homosociality refers detailally to the non-sexual attractions held by men (or women) for members of their own sex. (Bird 120) Within this framework of interpretation, writers ha ve admit certain elements as vital to social interaction among men. Incapability of displaying emotions is one element, homophobia is another. Cultural norms are decent in this sense, because they work as blueprints for how men and women perceive friendships are supposed to be (Walker 126). She claims that few writers have noticed that we must theorize friendships (like all other gendered activity) within a cyclical framework where cultural ideologies inform gendered social interaction, as well as pay attention to how people merge and rile sense of structuring elements and behavior.Far too often writers isolate the ideology of gender, and leave out the context and specific practice that people carry out. Men in their late 20s or early 30s usually define masculinity as performance, which is, continuously reflecting upon their own personality, identity and behavior. Thus, they reflect what is referred to as by Anthony Giddens that in modern society individuals are involved in an on going reflexive project of the self. Giddens claims that people in the West are increasingly aware of a pure relation, one that enables one to know someone else fully and in to the most profound depth. Lets discuss how Joey and Chandler are clearly positioning themselves within the gendered ideologies of mens room relations. They find it problematic to take out emotional care and interest in each other since this opposes to what they know is socially acceptable for heterosexual person men to do as partly due to heterosexual constraints on mens emotional presence (Joyrich 1996). There are significant differences between what we say and what we do, as Walker (Walker 126) points out. She questions whether mens and womens same-sex friendships differ distinctively, disagreeing that mens friendships are motivated by activity, while women emphasise the importance of sharing feelings in friendships with other women. She reflects analogous attitudes, finding a gap between the collective tough masculinity, and the individual mens experiences and attitudes. Cultural ideologies were not aright enough to disable the people she interviewed from making their own friendships in practice differ significantly from the norm. Walker contrasts these